I have no idea when these cars are going to go into production, but given that it’s an old abandoned Ford Project now reborn without Ford it looks quite promising:
PM
You did know that Think was around before Ford got involved right? It is still good to hear that they are up and running again.
[QUOTE=Lazlow;417]PM
You did know that Think was around before Ford got involved right? It is still good to hear that they are up and running again.
http://www.autoindustry.co.uk/news/17-08-06_5[/QUOTE]
Nope, I didn’t actually 
Good to know
I remember these guys! I saw an article in a magazine years back about them. Can’t remember if it was Car Craft or Playboy haha.
It makes me wonder who came first. Think or Smart. Either way one name was the answer to the first.
Cheers.
why would you want it to go through? gah…
the reason people dont buy electric is because they look like that. if i have the option of a car that costs me 10 bucks a month, but looks like a fish with down syndrome, or a car that costs 150 and looks like a vicious animal, i’m sorry but the retard-fish can get back on the short bus
there’s no excuse for a car to look like that. sorry. none. at all. clearly car manufacturers dont know what a futuristic car should look like, as demonstrated by the PT loser… i mean cruiser.
[QUOTE=rangerx52;445]why would you want it to go through? gah…
the reason people dont buy electric is because they look like that. if i have the option of a car that costs me 10 bucks a month, but looks like a fish with down syndrome, or a car that costs 150 and looks like a vicious animal, i’m sorry but the retard-fish can get back on the short bus
there’s no excuse for a car to look like that. sorry. none. at all. clearly car manufacturers dont know what a futuristic car should look like, as demonstrated by the PT loser… i mean cruiser.[/QUOTE]
Come on now, the Think and PT Cruiser are both perfectly acceptable chick cars :rolleyes: